Interplanetary “Day After Tomorrow?”

Part 3

An Enterprise Mission Hyperdimensional Report

Richard C. Hoagland
David Wilcock

Saturn

As seen in Figure 27, Saturn displays a quasi-stationary, highly geometric, multi-tiered linear cloud pattern -- arranged in the shape of a perfect hexagon -- centered precisely over its northern polar region. This remarkable formation (the clouds within this geometric pattern continually race backwards, against Saturn’s eastward spin) was first discovered by time-lapse imaging from the Voyager unmanned missions, in 1980-1981. The apparent “upper atmosphere, standing wave pattern” has remained stable and visible for at least 15 years, “suggesting [it is] a long-lived feature apparently insensitive to the strong seasonal forcing in Saturn’s polar regions.” The hexagonal wave-structure is thus “conjectured to be deeply-rooted in Saturn’s interior.” This provides powerful geometric support for an ongoing, interior hyperdimensional energy flow through Saturn -- which, in turn, creates a high-altitude, resonant, hexagonal (embedded tetrahedral) atmospheric pattern around its northern rotational axis.[82]

Figure 27 - Saturn’s North Polar Hexagon: as seen (A) by the Voyager spacecraft in 1980
(resolution -- 566 nm; from Godfrey 1988) and (B) with the HST in July 1991 (resolution -- 656 nm).

In the space immediately surrounding Saturn, the planet’s own tube-shaped (toroidal) cloud of plasma energy (similar to that lying along the orbit of Jupiter’s moon, Io) became 1000% denser than expected between 1981 and 1993… truly a stunning change for only twelve years’ time, exactly like the energetic increases we are seeing with Jupiter.[83] We do know that this cloud is closely aligned with the orbit of Saturn’s moon, Enceladus. Unfortunately, we have not been able to locate any images of this stunning, rapidly-changing cloud formation.

And, though Saturn was approached three times previously -- by Pioneer II (in 1979) and Voyagers 1 and 2 (in 1980 and 1981, respectively) -- it wasn’t until 1995that a bright aurora was photographed around Saturn’s poles by the Hubble Space Telescope, an aurora capable of “rapid changes in its brightness in short periods of time.”[84] This is not conclusive proof that the Saturn aurorae are a new phenomenon, but it certainly is another potential point of interest that correlates well with the over 1000% increase in the density of Saturn’s plasma torus. Below (Figure 28) is a Hubble image of the brilliant aurorae from 1998.

Figure 28 – Saturn aurorae imaged at both poles by HST in 1998 (NASA)

Between 1980 and 1996, the speed of rotation for Saturn’s clouds at the equator reduced by a whopping 58.2 percent, described as an “unexpected and dramatic change in weather.” The NASA explanation offered for this definitely anomalous behavior, however, was that old standby -- “seasonal changes”:

WELLESLEY, Mass. - Saturn, one of the windiest planets, has recently had an unexpected and dramatic change in weather: its equatorial winds have subsided from a rapid 1700 km/hr during the Voyager spacecraft flybys in 1980-81 to a modest 990 km/hr from 1996 to 2002. This slow-down in the winds has been detected by a Spanish-American team of scientists, including Richard French of Wellesley College in Massachusetts, who report their findings in the June 5 issue of the journal, Nature. (5 June 2003, Vol. 423, pp. 623-625)…

Using the high-resolution capability of the Wide Field Planetary Camera onboard the HST, the Spanish-American team has been able to track enough cloud elements in Saturn to measure the wind velocity over a broad range of latitudes. The equatorial winds measured in 1996-2001 are only half as strong as was found in 1980-81, when the Voyager spacecraft visited the planet. In contrast, the windy jets far from the equator have remained stable and show a strong hemispheric symmetry not found in Jupiter.

The different behavior of Saturn’s winds could have a simple explanation, note the scientists. The long seasonal cycle in Saturn’s atmosphere (one Saturn year is about thirty terrestrial years) and the equatorial shadowing by the planet’s giant rings could account for the sudden slowdown in the equatorial winds ….[85]

Even more provocative changes in Saturn were detected by non-optical telescopic data….

“Massive,” highly anomalous emissions of x-rays from Saturn’s equatorial region (Figure 29) -- as opposed to x-rays accompanying the polar aurorae as expected -- were detected and localized to Saturn’s equator for the first time in 2004, by NASA’s Chandra X-Ray Observatory, operating in Earth orbit.[86] Though the left image appears to show another “Great Spot” similar to the one on Jupiter, this is actually a time-lapse image -- spanning more than one ~10-hour Saturnian rotation (actually, about ~20 hours total)! So, the concentration of brightness here is NOT due to any “Great Saturn Spot,” but is due to geometric factors of the x-ray image acquisition process itself. The brightest x-rays are emerging from all along the equatorial plane, not just in any one area.

Figure 29 - Chandra X-Ray image of Saturn (left), compared with Hubble visual image (right). Note concentration of x-ray emission from Saturn’s equatorial atmosphere, below the sunlit plane of the rings (NASA)

NASA scientists have had to confront equally dramatic changes that also seemed to be occurring in Saturn’s most well-known and illustrious feature -- its stunning planetary rings.…

Curious, linear dark features… termed “spoke” formations (Figure 30)… were first observed lying across the rings during the previously mentioned Voyager robotic flybys in 1980-1981. Their most anomalous characteristic: the spokes revolved in distinct “non-Keplerian” fashion -- with the outer sections of the narrow, inexplicably radial formations racing around Saturn much faster than the underlying ring particles can orbit under gravitational attraction… at the same distance from the giant planet.[87]

Figure 30 - Composite Image of “Spoke” Formations Observed by Voyager in 1980-81 (NASA)

In December of 2003, planetary scientists working the Cassini mission -- the first new spacecraft to return to Saturn since the ‘80’s Voyager visitations -- eagerly anticipated learning more about these remarkable radial formations -- this time, via extreme close-ups, acquired with a CCD Cassini imaging system fully 100 times better than Voyager’s “primitive” vidicon cameras.[88] How would they look? What new things could they teach us? How did they get there? Why do they exist in the first place?

However, by February 2004, the problem could no longer be ignored… the Cassini imaging team was forced to acknowledge that, mysteriously, the spokes -- despite far superior imaging, taken at closer distances than Voyager’s discovery observations (Figure 30) -- were no longer visible.[89] They, quite literally, just disappeared! Hence, “something” in Saturn’s formidable rings also has changed… dramatically… in just two decades, just like the other changes we are seeing on Saturn and throughout the solar system.

Figure 31 – Saturn as breathtakingly imaged by the approaching Cassini spacecraft.
And… nary a “spoke” to be seen. (NASA)

Turning to some of Saturn’s major satellites:

Chandra x-ray observations of Saturn’s largest moon, Titan, produced a major surprise: Titan appears to have had a 10-15% increase in the height of its atmosphere, as of January 2003 (Figure 32). According to the official NASA release:

“On January 5, 2003, Titan -- Saturn’s largest moon and the only moon in the solar system with a thick atmosphere -- crossed in front of the Crab Nebula…

The diameter of Titan’s shadow was found to be larger than the known diameter of its solid surface. This difference in diameters yields a measurement of about 550 miles (880 kilometers) for the height of the X-ray absorbing region of Titan’s atmosphere.

The extent of the upper atmosphere is consistent with, or slightly (10-15%) larger, than that implied by Voyager I observations made at radio, infrared and ultraviolet wavelengths in 1980. Saturn was about 5% closer to the Sun in 2003, so increased solar heating of Titan may have caused its atmosphere to expand.”[90]

Figure 32 – Chandra X-ray Telescope captures x-ray shadow of Titan, measuring its diameter,
as Saturn’s largest satellite crosses in front of the Crab Nebula – a shattered stellar remnant
nebula emitting copious x-rays, located approximately 6000 light years beyond Saturn. (NASA)

However, if NASA’s more conservative estimates of Titan’s former atmospheric depth (250 miles -- from Voyager observations in 1981) were correct,[91] then Titan’s total atmosphere may have actually expanded by as much as 200%… in just the last 23 years… from 250 to 550 miles in height!

In Titan’s atmosphere itself, optical and infrared observations carried out with the 10-meter Keck telescopes in Hawaii have imaged fast-moving, bright methane clouds in Titan’s southern hemisphere -- which are equally inexplicable in mainstream models. According to a recent paper in Nature:

The December 2001 cloud has a brightness equivalent to about 0.3% of the total brightness of the disk of Titan at these wavelengths, and can be explained by a single (foreshortened) cloud of 200 km diameter or smaller clouds within the same total area. The 28 February 2002 cloud is significantly larger, reflecting a flux equivalent to about 1% of the total flux of Titan…

The most striking property of these transient cloud events is their unexpected concentration near the south pole of Titan. Although heating at southern summer solstice might be expected to drive polar convection, studies of tropospheric conditions on Titan have suggested an absence of seasonal variation (12, 13) and predicted that methane clouds, if present, should concentrate at the equator year round (14)…” [92]

Figure 33 – Sequential IR imaging over several months by the 10-meter Keck Telescope,
showing Titan surface features and bright, high-altitude methane polar clouds.

In conventional Titan meteorology, “bright” clouds would be expected over the warmest, not the coldest, regions (because of thermal convection -- upward movement due to heating -- resulting in high level recondensation into highly reflective methane “cirrus ice”). In colder latitudes, such high methane cirrus -- if present at all -- would not be expected to move around so quickly… so the observations of “fast-moving, bright clouds” in the southern polar regions of Titan pose another major Saturnian puzzle.

However, since the south pole of Titan marks another perfect “standing wave” resonance point in the Hyperdimensional Model, it is not surprising to see brightness flares at and around that exact location -- as hyperdimensional forces there, actually assisted by the extreme cold (via a dramatic reduction in random thermal activity), could be causing the observed high-level condensation. Also, if you go back to Figure 33 and look again -- particularly, at the one for Dec. 11, and Dec. 10, 2001, and also Feb. 22, 2002 (but especially, Dec. 11,) -- you can see portions of what appears to be two straight lines enclosing a brighter area that could form part of either a “hexagon,” or “pentagon.” Three lines are actually visible in the Dec. 11th image within Figure 33…

And, while we’re on the subject of Titan and “Hyperdimensional signatures,” we cannot leave without demonstrating one just more ….

A few years ago, in one of the first ground-based telescopic images to penetrate Titan’s thick methane atmosphere in the infrared and see the actual moon’s surface, a bright “mountain” was detected “near Titan’s equator.” Careful measurements of its position by one of us (Hoagland), revealed another fascinating confirmation of the internally resonating fluid (lava), Hyperdimensional Model (Figure 34) ….

Figure 34 – 10-meter Keck infrared image reveals possible “large mountain”
on Titan … at 19.5 degrees south latitude. (Keck)

In terms of the other Saturnian moons: ozone molecules were detected over two satellites for the first time, via Hubble observations in the late 1990s. The ozone was detected hovering over Saturn’s moons, Dione and Rhea, in 1997. The presence of ozone is impossible without a supply of free oxygen – presumably, from the extensive (water) icy surfaces of these two moons.[93]

But, what could suddenly be liberating enough water vapor from these frigid satellites to be split into free oxygen… to then recombine into newly detectable ozone… in the essential vacuum just above those perpetually icy landscapes? Unless, of course, the water vapor was coming up from warmed water beneath all that ice (but warmed by what -- underwater volcanoes?!) -- and the water vapor was then split into hydrogen and oxygen, when it escaped (through surface cracks) and was exposed to the intense ionizing radiation around Saturn .…

The split-off oxygen atoms would then have recombined (briefly) into the detected ozone molecules.

No matter what the final explanation, the Hubble observations are significant additional evidence of things also “heating up” -- more energy available, from “somewhere” -- throughout the Saturnian system.…

Of all these new observations -- from persistent polar hexagonal cloud geometries and mysterious “polar methane clouds,” to the appearance of molecular ozone above otherwise geologically inactive icy satellites… all indicative of internal hyperdimensional resonance patterns within both Saturn and it’s largest moon… to totally baffling new x-ray phenomena in Saturn’s atmosphere… to a 1000% increase in the bright cloud surrounding Saturn… to the mind-boggling disappearance of one of the most alluring “new Voyager phenomena” of Saturn’s rings, its remarkable “spokes” -- the overwhelming evidence is that Saturn, like the rest of the solar system, is inexplicably changing. Not on a timescale of “geological eras”… or, even in a human lifetime… but in mere decades.

In another paper, we shall treat in some detail two of these dramatic changes -- the highly mysterious disappearance of the “spokes”… and the simultaneous detection of equally mystifying x-rays coming from the equatorial regions of Saturn -- and how they are related.

For, it is obvious from official comments--

"It's a puzzle, since the intensity of Saturn's X-rays requires that Saturn reflects X-rays fifty times more efficiently than the Moon .”[http://www1.msfc.nasa.gov/NEWSROOM/news/releases/2004/04-031.html]

--that mainstream NASA planetary scientists haven’t a clue as to what’s causing these two simultaneous phenomena… Or--

The grave danger they pose to the approaching, billion-dollar Cassini Mission.

Fortunately, we do.

Figure 35 – Cassini brakes into Saturn orbit, July 1, 2004, directly over the rings -- by firing its on-board engine to allow capture by Saturn’s massive gravitational field. (NASA artist’s concept)

Uranus

Though Uranus “appeared as featureless as a cue ball” in 1986 when Voyager flew by, remarkably bright clouds began appearing as of at least 1996… clouds “almost as large as continents on Earth, such as Europe” showing up in only ten years or less! [94]

By 1998, two years later, the Hubble Space Telescope had discovered nearly as many clouds in a short time in the high Uranian atmosphere as had ever been observed in the entire history of Uranus before. One of these clouds was “brighter than any other cloud ever seen on Uranus.”[95] (Figure 36)

About a year later in 1999, with the changes only continuing to increase, NASA articles were referring to Uranus as being “hit” by “Huge Storms,” [96] making it “a dynamic world with the brightest clouds in the outer solar system.” As an interesting analogy, NASA also said that “If springtime on Earth were anything like it will be on Uranus, we would be experiencing waves of massive storms, each one covering the country from Kansas to New York, with temperatures of 300 degrees below zero.”[97]

Sound a bit familiar … like certain cataclysmic weather elements being depicted right now here on Earth … in a certain feature film?

Figure 36 - False-Color Infrared Image of Emerging High-Altitude Bright Clouds on Uranus (NASA/HST 1998)

All this begs a question, though ….

Has Uranus always been like this, displaying these specific brilliant features in the clouds -- and we simply didn’t get the chance to properly observe them any time before? Or, have they just tilted into Earth view with the passage of time and Uranus’s ponderous 64-year orbit of the Sun? Are there really any changes going on that are that unusual … or, are we just learning about what was already there before?

Here’s the answer: the head NASA scientist referred to these increasingly bright and active clouds as “really big, big changes” on Uranus , compared to what we had seen with Voyager just 13 years before. And, let’s not forget that Voyager did not see Uranus from the same angle that we do from Earth with ground-based telescopes or Hubble.[98]

Even so, some skeptics will probably still attack -- confidently asserting “nothing unusual is going on” … “it’s all the ‘same-old-same-old’ …” or, “any changes are just the result of normal ‘seasonal’ variations, due to Uranus’ constantly changing position relative to the sun.”

Quite the contrary.

In October 2000, an official NASA briefing admitted that there are “discrete features northward of 25 degrees N that have the highest contrast ever seen for a Uranian cloud” . Remember: the highest-contrast (read: greatest brightness) cloud ever seen on Uranus was not spotted until the year … 2000.

Here’s the official clincher: “long-term ground-based observations [of Uranus, are showing] seasonal brightness changes”… So, even from Earth, significant changes have been cataloged… based on new cloud patterns “whose origins are not well understood.”[99]

Ok, even though it is easiest to blame Uranus’ brand new, continent-sized, surprisingly bright clouds on its angular position relative to its orbit of the Sun, the preceding official NASA analysis reveals that the science just does not exist to explain how such clouds could be formed … in such a manner.

The HD Model does ….

Higher-dimensional, fluid-like energy (existing all around us, in a massfree aether, just out of reach of our physical five senses and most conventional detection instruments…) is obviously building up within Uranus, and the many other bodies we’ve been examining all across the solar system. When this occurs, objects (such as planets, or satellites) are forced to “bleed off” this energy into our own three-dimensional frame of reference, where it manifests in various forms depending on the nature of the three-D materials involved.

In bloated, gaseous planets, it is signaled by the appearance of “bright, new cloudlike features” -- via the additional input of energy sustaining heightened convective activity, and the subsequent high-altitude condensation of brilliant clouds of ice crystals … such as the methane cirrus now appearing in Uranus’ upper atmosphere.

On the other hand, if the energy appears in a rocky satellite (or planet), without a substantial atmosphere -- such as Jupiter’s Io -- the increased thermal activity creates a recognizable geometric pattern of internal volcanic heating and eruptions, corresponding to the hyperdimensional resonance flow between dimensions -- resulting, for instance, in the newly-seen “200-mile-wide lava hotspot” at a precise geometric location on Io’s surface.

What about Uranus’ atmosphere itself?

If the overall planetary brightness of Uranus, due to increased convective cloud activity, is changing so dramatically -- then is there any hint of equally massive atmospheric compositional changes that should accompany these climate variations in the HD Model? Changes similar to the “high increases of helium and heavier ions” now being seen in the Sun’s plasma emissions; the “embarrassing” 10% decrease of heavy elements in Jupiter’s atmosphere (coupled to a corresponding 10% increase in helium, one of the same basic elements also mysteriously increasing in the Sun); the recent “surprise… abundance” of ozone in Mars’ atmosphere; or, the “dramatic” decrease in sulfur gases in Venus’ atmosphere… coupled with that equally baffling, apparent simultaneous increase in oxygen -- the latter appearing in the form of a geometrically-defined, “tetrahedral” auroral brightness increase … of over 2500 percent!?

There is, indeed.

We do, in fact, see a measurable change in the composition of the Uranian atmosphere, which has appeared just recently. Carbon monoxide (CO) gas was detected in Uranus’ atmosphere for the first time in December 2003, and the observing scientists feel that this gas comes from dust flowing throughout the solar system.[100] The origin of this new dust plays a very important role in (the Wilcock version of) the HD model, as we briefly explore later in Part 4… This “anomalous” dust appears to be finding its way into planetary atmospheres all across the solar system where it was never seen before, including Earth.

By contrast, it is the other author’s opinion (Hoagland) -- backed by revolutionary laboratory data from the “new energy community” -- that such dramatic compositional changes are likely a direct by-product of the rising HD energies themselves … a literal planetary alchemical transformation of one element (or elements) into another, within these planetary atmospheres …. A more definitive detailing of this Model, and an overview of the current, supporting laboratory evidence, will be forthcoming on Enterprise soon ….

Before we leave the Uranian system, we have yet another surprise in store.

There is a unique geometric phenomenon present on one of Uranus’ most intriguing moons -- not directly connected with any of the current changes we’ve been highlighting -- but highly indicative of the fundamental Physics underlying all these solar system changes. Our last set of images in this section dramatically reveals this remarkable phenomenon -- a physical process, involved in the formation (one of us, Wilcock, believes) of the Uranian moon, Miranda -- a process that directly supports the HD model.

Acquired by Voyager 2, in January, 1986, the startling images of a bright, obviously geometric, “L- shaped” formation on Miranda (Figure 37 -- left) is very unambiguous -- and completely without any theoretical explanation in conventional geological models for the moon’s formation, or subsequent evolution .… Look closely, and study the two sides of the image (below) carefully.…

Figure 37 - Voyager image of Uranian moon Miranda (L) and underlying three-fold triangular geometry (R).
(NASA (L) with additions by Wilcock (R), 2004.)

What is the likelihood of seeing a set of similar angles, in such nearby proximity and relationship, with such straight-lined geometric perfection -- if this were only a “natural formation” (in the mainstream sense)? Even the slightly widened nature of the two higher, smaller triangles is not unexpected: since the shape of the underlying geometric “stress patterns” is being projected onto a spherical surface. The geometry is patently obvious, even without a theoretical basis in place -- with the major clue to its origin being that the largest observable “triangle” on Miranda is … or once was … perfectly equilateral.

A more complete overview of the scenario that accounts for this unique satellite geometry has been presented in Wilcock’s “Divine Cosmos” (and will be reiterated, to some degree, in Part 4 of this Report), but here’s the crux of the model:

After Miranda formed, in the dust and gaseous nebula which orbited Uranus in the forming solar system, there was a subsequent, apparent physical expansion of Miranda … shortly (geologically speaking) after its own formation. The process appears to have been shaped by internal “geometric forces” -- resonant internal energy patterns still unacknowledged (let alone explained) by any mainstream planetary models.

When this process was occurring, most of the surface of the now icy Miranda was composed of a high percentage of liquid water (!) for a time -- ideal conditions for a fluid-like HD energy to express itself as “formative geometry” in our dimension. In that early era, the normally-invisible internal geometric resonances that we have proposed elsewhere in this Report -- as shaping surface other features on other planets and their moons -- were apparently able to leave their unmistakable geometric signature on the rapidly-cooling, icy surface layers of this “ice ball” moon … for Voyager to find.

According to Wilcock, the “triangles” that we can still make out in Figures 37 and 38 appear to show the faces of a regular geometric solid -- an icosahedron -- which is shaped like a soccer ball, with 20 faces, each of which is a perfect equilateral triangle. Studying the image more closely, it is also possible to see a straight white line (indicated) -- that could indicate a fourth triangle, in a perfect “ratcheted” angular position immediately below the two others, and perfectly offset at the same base angle. Yet another white mark on the moon’s surface could locate the top corner of a fifth triangle, smaller than the others and with the same basic rotation involved, but we haven’t drawn it into Figure 38 in order that the image stays a little less cluttered. See for yourself:

Figure 38 - Voyager composite image of Uranian moon Miranda (L) and underlying
“ratcheting” four-fold triangular geometry (R). (NASA 1988 / Wilcock 2004)

Though we have not tried to model it here, notice that the largest (again, equilateral!) triangle is not just one line… it is a series of “nested” or “striated” straight lines, suggesting that the “energy geometry” may have been rapidly expanding (or, the moon rapidly contracting), leaving the striations in the freezing ice and dirt behind …. These striations are easier to spot as we investigate the next image, Figure 39, where we get a far more “up close and personal” view of the top of this remarkable triangular formation.

In examining Figure 39 -- again, taken from the 1986 Voyager 2 imagery of this amazing landscape -- you may notice a feature that NASA scientists have also puzzled over for almost a generation… a very large, vertical cliff that pokes straight up out of the surface, just above the northern tip of the largest triangle (Figure 39 -- upper right), and aligned with its western edge. Indeed, at 5 to 6.25 miles tall, this is quite literally the largest cliff in the entire solar system -- fully 300% higher than the Grand Canyon is deep!

This 6-mile-high, straight-lined cliff clearly shows the enormous internal stresses that these geometric energies were able to exert during the formation of the moon. The apparently fragile nature of the surface ice allowed the internal geometric resonances to literally tear the brittle surface of the moon apart … leaving 6-mile-high “fingerprints” pointing toward the stars.

These silent sentinels now stand as 30,000-foot, shining shards of ice … mute testimony to the awesome Hyperdimensional forces that can literally shatter worlds ….

Figure 39 - Geometrically Positioned Vertical Cliff on Miranda, 5-6 Miles High (NASA 1986)

When presented with this stupendous evidence, falling on the exact same straight line that anyone can extend off of the main “triangle” on Miranda, even NASA had to say “something” about how “anomalous” it was… seeing such huge cliffs towering above the surface of such a comparatively tiny moon (Miranda is only ~300 miles across!). It is not often that NASA claims that an anomaly is “quite surprising,” but this is one example where they had to:[101]

Figure P-15.3 offers more evidence of the intensity of both vertical and horizontal deformation on Miranda. A near-vertical, stratified scarp 8 to 10 km [5-6.25 miles] in height (upper right) represents the highest cliff known in the solar system (even exceeding the relief of the huge cliffs in Valles Marineris on Mars and more than three times the relief of the Grand Canyon). Vertical grooves (from shearing between fault blocks?) appear on the cliff face. Such a huge cliff, remaining intact, is quite surprising on a small icy body .

Also potentially significant is a seemingly pentagonal structure in the same striated dusty ice, to the east of the main triangular figure. In this next Voyager 2 image, we see multiple “nested” layers of straight lines on the right side of the moon, just as we have seen in the main triangular area. The angles between these lines seem to be perfectly pentagonal… the second huge, unmistakably geometric “bite” into an otherwise smooth “cookie,” with many visible layers of striations (Figure 40).

Figure 40 - “Nested” Pentagonal Feature on Uranian moon Miranda (NASA 1988, Wilcock 2004)

Furthermore, if you look closely at the image on the left in Figure 40, you will see an area in the center of the “pentagonal” striated feature where there is a distinct change… a different geometry seems to slice through the straight lines, as if it were superimposed on top of them! Inside this geometric area, the striations stop, and the surface looks far more similar to the rest of the moon’s surface. Upon close inspection, this “superimposed” area also appears to be pentagonal, but on a slight rotational offset from the other pentagon formation. Thus, the “triangles” are not the only “ratcheting” geometry visible in the formation of Miranda.

For those who really do get excited by the details, the angle of offset between these two main pentagonal formations appears very similar to the main offset angle between the triangles in Figures 37 and 38. NASA’s “full moon” composite image shown in Figures 37 and 38 seems to have distorted some of the pentagonal details, as gray areas were arbitrarily filled in where data was missing (at the top) … apparently assuming that the striated structure did not continue past the point where Voyager’s imaging cuts off.

When we look to the west of the main triangular image, even more ribbed straight-line structures appear… (!) … suggesting that there could be yet additional geometry to discover, if the entire moon were properly photographed -- since at present we have only seen the better part of one side of it. In this case, it appears (Figure 41) that we are again seeing a 60-degree angle in the straight lines, suggesting similar equilateral triangles as those appearing in the main “L” feature:

Figure 41 - Layered, Possibly Triangular Feature Due West of “Ratcheted Triangle” Formation (NASA 1986)

All in all, the Uranian moon Miranda is second-to-none in showing us how these geometric “resonance energies” emerge within a solid, planetary object and can shape major portions of its surface -- even if that object is “only” 300 miles across. In these historic Voyager images, remarkable and surprising additional support is thus provided to the Hyperdimensional Model… which gives us the physical engine to drive these otherwise totally inexplicable surface patterns on Miranda.

An important afterthought: why just on Miranda? Why not equally tell-tale, equally geometric “Hyperdimensional surface features” on any of the other ~138 moons… currently known to orbit the major planets of this solar system?

Due to Miranda’s unique display of highly ordered surface features, coupled with its unique position in the solar system, the other author of this Report (Hoagland) has a slightly different explanation for the remarkable geometries Voyager 2 discovered on Miranda .…

As most people who are interested in the solar system already know, Uranus has a highly anomalous “obliquity” (tilt) to the plane of its orbit around the Sun (~98 degrees…), compared with any of the other planets. For this reason, Hoagland theorizes that sometime in the past history of the solar system, Uranus experienced a literal, radical, polar shift in space. Such a “major polar reorientation” -- for such a massive, rapidly spinning object -- would have created enormous hyperdimensional forces, not only inside Uranus… but also in the space immediately surrounding the massive, rapidly rotating planet -- forces that would have included the close-in orbit of… Miranda.

Hoagland contends that such unimaginable forces would have literally “turned Miranda inside out” -- re-melting the entire, previously icy moon in the process!

As Miranda literally resolidified, the enormous hyperdimensional resonances in the space surrounding it -- attempting to reshape the moon’s internal structure to conform to these resonant geometries still present in the aether from it’s massive, nearby primary -- were literally frozen into portions of the surface of this refreezing icy moon, preserving … forever … the otherwise invisible hyperdimensional fingerprints of the awesome planetary catastrophe which had occurred.

The presence of extensive cratering in other regions of this satellite, right alongside the highly geometric sections, Hoagland believes, testifies to the true nature of the Event which caused this literally moon-wrenching destruction and recreation: the explosion, 65 million years ago, of another major planet -- Planet V -- orbiting closer to the inner solar system… where now only the scattered debris of asteroids roam. [For a fuller examination of this theory and its other far-reaching solar system implications, the reader is referred to “The Mars Tidal Model’ at http://www.enterprisemission.com/tides.htm].

Thus, in Hoagland’s Model, it is because of Miranda’s unique location -- as the closest satellite to a major planet that one day literally tipped over, creating enormous hyperdimensional stresses in the space (and any objects!) immediately surrounding it -- that this tiny moon has now preserved upon its surface a unique record of the literal process of hyperdimensional creation… vital, additional clues to what is really going on all across the solar system … even now.

Our next stop on this bold new tour of the solar system is Neptune… and if you think that the data is going to tire out and get any less dramatic, as we head into colder and colder regions of the outer solar system, where solar energy must carry less and less of an effect … then you’re in for a real surprise.

Neptune is a “textbook Hyperdimensional case” -- in every sense of the word.

The image of Neptune featured in Figure 43 is one of the single most dramatic, full color images of undeniably obvious solar-system change now have available. If you know someone who really has trouble believing any of this, no matter how obviously you spell it out for to them, show them Figure 43 … and show it first.

The increasing brightness that we have just explored on Uranus is precisely mirrored with an even greater increasing brightness on Neptune… plus a myriad of other changes totally reinforcing our earlier discussions.

Neptune

By June 1994, Neptune’s “Great Dark Spot” -- a circular atmospheric feature in the southern hemisphere, at our familiar 19.5-degree latitude, just like the “Great Red Spot” on Jupiter -- had mysteriously disappeared.

For reference, Figure 42 shows us what this Great Dark Spot looked like to Voyager 2… before it literally vanished.

Figure 42 – Neptune, with Great Dark Spot in center, as seen by Voyager 2 in 1989. (NASA)

By April of 1995, Neptune’s Great Dark Spot had reappeared … but … in Neptune’s northern hemisphere… accompanied by more bright, high-altitude clouds! NASA itself noted that this new spot was a “near-mirror image of the first spot previously imaged by Voyager 2.”[102]

This surprising change also led NASA scientists to observe that “Neptune has changed radically since 1989… New features indicate that with Neptune’s extraordinary dynamics, the planet can look completely different in just a few weeks.” And even more importantly, for the HD model, NASA said: “Energy from the Sun drives the Earth’s weather system. However, the mechanism on Neptune must be very different because the planet radiates 2 times more energy than it receives from the distant, dim Sun …”[103] .

Are you starting to see a pattern here?

Two years after these official descriptions, NASA wrote of “a looming mystery”:

When the planetary probe Voyager visited Neptune in 1989, it detected the Great Dark Spot, a pulsating feature nearly the size of the Earth itself. Two years ago, Hubble observations showed the spot had disappeared, and that another smaller spot had emerged. But instead of growing to a large-scale storm like the Great Dark Spot, the new spot appears to be trapped at a fixed latitude and may be declining in intensity, said Sromovsky, a senior scientist …[104] .

What, exactly, would “trap” the new spot at a fixed latitude, exactly the same number of degrees above the equator as the previous spot was below the equator!? This is easily explainable in the Hyperdimensional Model, as a 180-degree phase shift in the simplest resonant (tetrahedral) pattern underlying Neptune’s internal fluid dynamics… which forces the precise positioning of “the Great Dark Spot” -- the vortex resonantly shifting from 19.5 degrees south latitude… to 19.5 degrees north. [Refer back to Figure 3, in Part Two of this Report, for an explanatory diagram of this underlying HD geometry.]

If you’re thinking that this “HD phase shift” of Neptune is somehow correlated with the shift of vortex activity away from Jupiter’s equatorial regions, towards the polar regions… and the 58.6% slowdown of cloud rotations at Saturn’s equatorial region… with the surprise emergence of x-ray emissions along Saturn’s equator, rather than the poles as NASA would expect… and the disappearance of the so-called “spoke” formations in Saturn’s rings… then congratulations, Neo…

…you have taken “the red pill” and begun using your new “eyes” for the first time… seeing “the real world” beyond the limitations inherent in the confined “box” of three dimensions… or what some might call the “Matrix.”

Well done. There is, indeed, no spoon…

It gets better. By 1996, less than a year after this “hyperdimensional Neptunian pole shift,” Dr. Lawrence Sromovsky noticed an increase in Neptune’s overall brightness, which continued dramatically surging upwards through 2002 (Figure 43). Though the false-color photo speaks far louder than the statistics, the fact is that in only six short years, blue light became 3.2% brighter on Neptune, red light 5.6% brighter… and near-infrared light intensified by a whopping 40%. Even more surprisingly, some areas of latitude became fully 100 percent brighter!

In this case, we invite you to read this stunning discovery in NASA’s own words, while also noticing how these unprecedented, planet-wide changes in brightness are boringly “explained away” by a “simple seasonal variation model” related to Neptune’s tilt angle to the Sun… (…yawn…)

April 22, 2002, Madison, WI—Hubble Space Telescope (HST) imaging observations in August 2002 show that Neptune’s brightness has increased significantly since 1996… and now appears to be consistent with a simple seasonal variation model… Comparing August 2002 observations to similar observations in 1996, the authors found that Neptune’s reflectivity averaged across the planet’s face (disk-averaged) increased by 3.2% at 467 nm (blue), 5.6% at 673 nm (red), and 40% in the 850 nm–1000 nm band (near infrared). These changes result from even larger brightness increases in restricted latitude bands, reaching 100% in some cases. The reason for the increases may be seasonal forcing, which is the seasonal variation in local solar heating.”[105]

Figure 43 – Atmospheric brightness increases on Neptune, 1996-2002. (Sromovsky et al. / NASA / HST)

Though this last NASA article makes it all seem good and simple, like “a neat little light show brought on by very ordinary meteorology”… there are other articles that speak far more candidly. The bottom line is that the physics to explain such a change in brightness is just not there in the conventional models, since Neptune “seems to run on almost no energy”. But don’t take our word for it… read what the scientists themselves have had to say:

…Some of the wildest, weirdest weather in the solar system… a planet whose blustery weather -- monster storms and equatorial winds of 900 miles per hour - bewilders scientists…

The weather on Neptune, the eighth planet from the sun, is an enigma to begin with. The mechanism that drives its near-supersonic winds and giant storms has yet to be discerned.

On Earth, weather is driven by energy from the sun as it heats the atmosphere and oceans. On Neptune, the sun is 900 times dimmer and scientists have yet to understand how Neptune's weather-generating machinery can be so efficient. "It's an efficient weather machine compared to Earth," said Sromovsky. "It seems to run on almost no energy."…

Sromovsky said that compared to the look provided by the Voyager spacecraft, Neptune is a different place: “The character of Neptune is different from what it was at the time of Voyager. The planet seems stable, yet different.”[106]

If the planet itself is changing, then what about its satellites?

Look no further: Neptune’s major moon, Triton, also experienced great changes… in this case, a “very large” 5% temperature increase between 1989 and 1998. According to MIT researchers, this is comparable to the Earth’s atmosphere globally heating up by 22 degrees Fahrenheit… in only 9 years![107] It is believed that Triton’s atmospheric pressure also has “at least doubled… since the time of the Voyager [1989] encounter.”[108]

It is curious that each of these components we have discovered throughout the solar system, like the warming trend on Triton, are so often discussed as single events, or perhaps with “one or two others” included… in a few, rare instances.

NASA does give us all the hard evidence we would ever need to make a case… but they, or the media reporting on their discoveries, simply never put this evidence together under one roof. Thus, the data continues to quietly slip out into the open undetected, while the gaping silence of yawns from the public perpetually haunts the prospects of any newly proposed space mission ever getting off the ground.

If these changes were to break into the open media, it is quite natural to assume that the public would become far more interested in tracking these truly remarkable changes… especially because of how they might affect us… and the funding would come rolling on in.

We know that the Earth is also undergoing major changes, as we will explore in unprecedented detail in Part 4 of this Report.

In the meantime, the only unexplored territory still remaining is the distant Pluto -- the icy planet on a long, elliptical orbit at the far outer reaches of our solar system, recently downgraded to a “planetesimal” status in most planetologists’ eyes. If Pluto can be shown to have any changes at all, then we most certainly are dealing with a solar-system-wide effect. Case closed.

Pluto does not disappoint.

Pluto

Before we discuss the likelihood of any real changes going on with Pluto, we have to begin by taking note of something important. Most conventional NASA explanations for these changes, as we have seen, revolve around the notion (pun intended!) that the planet or satellite’s angular tilt (obliquity) relative to the Sun, is by far the most likely cause of any observable changes. In the case of Pluto, the 248-year elliptical orbit it traces around the Sun actually brings it closer to the Sun than Neptune at certain times… which, incidentally, just occurred between 1979 and 1999… and much farther away from the Sun at other times.

Obviously, we would naturally assume that if a planet moves closer to the Sun, it is exposed to more heat than if it moves farther away from the Sun. Simple, right? If you’re heating your house with a single fireplace, you’re not going to hang out in the kitchen if the fire is in the living room. So, where is Pluto now?

Below (Figure 44) is a Hubble Space Telescope image of Pluto, taken several years ago. Because Pluto was slightly less than 3 billion miles from Earth (and still, at the time, inside Neptune’s orbit) when the image was acquired, even with Hubble’s superb resolution, the size of each “pixel” on the surface of the tiny planet was more than 100 miles across!

At that enormous distance, the strength (and thus the heating effect) of sunlight reaching Pluto’s surface was 800 times less than sunlight at Earth’s distance … and getting smaller with each passing hour!

Figure 44 – Pluto as imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope (actual images, upper right). The two larger images are computer-synthesized maps made from the raw Hubble images (NASA/ST Sci)

This is because -- crucially -- since 1989, Pluto has been moving away from the Sun in its highly elliptical, 248-year orbit. As you probably already guessed, 1989 was exactly halfway in the middle of the 1979-1999 period when Pluto was inside Neptune’s orbit.

Despite this drifting into the nether regions, where we would logically expect it to get colder and colder, something phenomenal is going on… something that utterly, totally puts the capstone on our Hyperdimensional Model.

Pluto’s temperature is increasing. Its atmospheric pressure is increasing. And not just a little…

A lot.

No, scratch that… by a truly tremendous amount.

Yet, this is all occurring even as Space.com admits, “Logic suggests the planet might cool as it receives less sunlight each day.”[109] Indeed.

A groundbreaking Pluto study, recently led by Dr. James L. Elliot, took advantage of a rare event, similar to the one we previously discussed with Saturn’s satellite, Titan. Pluto passed in front of a star in 2002, and this allowed Dr. Elliot and his associates to determine whether Pluto’s structure and composition had stayed the same, as previously observed in 1989, or if it had changed in some way.

To their obvious surprise, they discovered that the atmospheric pressure of Pluto has increased... by a full three hundred percent… (!) … between 1989 and 2002! This has also caused a noticeable rise in Pluto’s surface temperatures. Again, this is attributed by mainstream planetologists to… you guessed it… “seasonal change.”[110]

Remember just a bit earlier when we were discussing Neptune’s moon, Triton… how its global warming compares to the Earth becoming globally 22 degrees Fahrenheit hotter -- in only nine years? According to Dr. Elliot, “The changes observed in Pluto’s atmosphere are much more severe [than the “global warming” seen on Triton]. The changes observed on Triton were subtle. Pluto’s changes are not subtle… We just don’t know what is causing these effects.”[111]

Indeed, elsewhere Dr. Elliot says that the idea of “seasonal changes” being responsible for such a “severe” increase is “counterintuitive,” because, by orbiting farther from the Sun, it would be expected that Pluto’s temperatures would naturally fall… not rise![112]

Hence, Dr. Elliot and his other NASA team members acknowledge this unexpected “global warming” of Pluto, but they also say that this warming trend is “likely not connected with that of the Earth” since the “Sun’s output is much too steady.”[113] Furthermore, “some longer term change, analogous to long-term climatic changes on Earth” could be responsible.[114] Without identifying precisely what this longer-term change could be, they tread very closely to suggesting some single, unified cause… like what we present here in our hyperdimensional model.

Furthermore, not only has Pluto’s atmospheric pressure increased, but it is also showing signs of weather… for the first time, as was reported in a Space.com article:

Meanwhile, the new studies reveal what appear to be the first signs of weather on Pluto, small fluctuations of air density and temperature. Sicardy's team figures the changes, seen as spikes in the data, are caused "either by strong winds between the lit and dark hemispheres of the planet, or by convection near the surface of Pluto."

Scientists have long suspected that pressure difference in the tenuous atmosphere, created by stark temperature differences from the day side to the night side, would fuel brisk breezes.

The researchers did not attempt to estimate the strength of Pluto's apparent winds.

Pluto gives up its secrets slower than any planet.[115]

Given that even NASA seems to be vaguely aware that these distant, totally unexplainable changes in Pluto’s environment are, somehow, analogous to equally inexplicable “global warming” occurring here on Earth… by saying that the “global warming” of the Earth and of Pluto are “likely not connected”… in the closing section of this Report we shall therefore turn our attention back towards the Earth, where all of these changes truly matter most .…

* * *

For, it is in these Earthly shifts that we are shown most directly how our own lives may be dramatically affected by the “cosmic” physical processes and changes under discussion in this Report.

The Earth, in Part 4, will dramatically reveal a host of anomalies that are literally identical to many of the others that we have investigated elsewhere in the solar system. We will also explore “resonance interactions” between the Earth, the Sun, the Moon, other planets -- even a nearby pulsar, CP1133. Once the Earth data is complete, anyone who has read this paper with an open mind is likely to laugh out loud at petroleum-funded scientists who try to insist that “nothing much has changed” on the Earth… or in the greater solar system.

Climate change is here. It is real. It is taking place simultaneously on all our nearby worlds. It cannot be denied.

The question is this… could the knowledge of the Hyperdimensional Model enable Humanity to team up and find a way out of the cataclysms that may otherwise await us?

Is it worth it for scientists and political leaders to take this seriously, knowing that if they continue to ignore this evidence, they may be turning their backs on billions of lives that could be saved?

Think about it. Then act. Let others know what you may have learned for the very first time here. Forward them the link to this full Report… or, summarize the excerpts you think matter most and work up your own synopsis, giving your readers the link to bring them back to the full Report, in case they are interested…

If they live on Earth, they probably are. Here is “the red pill” that you can give them:

[http://www.enterprisemission.com/_articles/05-14-2004/Interplanetary_1.htm]

The time to argue that “nothing is happening” is over.

These are seasonal changes occurring all around us… a “Hyperdimensional Spring” that is blooming throughout our entire solar system. Will anyone be brave enough, and care enough, to act… in time?

Will you?

(Continued in Part 4)